Messages - webDiplomacy

Chat archive

27 Nov 08 UTC	Autumn, 1901: wtf
27 Nov 08 UTC	Autumn, 1901: Ke koño has hecho? xD
27 Nov 08 UTC	Autumn, 1901: Haciéndote pasar por noob para después demostrar tus dotes? xDDDD
02 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1902: Italia se va a quedar to loco con lo que voy a hacer ahora xD
05 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Well, looks like I'm screwed. Have fun!
06 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: You're screwed? What about me?! Well, I'll make a fight of it at least.
07 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Did it reset the timer for end of phase? I'm pretty sure it did. Because if so, I must say that I am so lucky.
08 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Yeah, lucky is the word.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Ha! Stole your Berlin! Muahahahahaha!
09 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Oh drop the act man. It is almost 100% that Turkey was multi-accounting with Russia. France even provided a link where he was in a game with his account and all the others were just his name with a number after.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: I even accused him of it and he did not deny it.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Wait, you're accusing me of multi-accounting?
09 Dec 08 UTC	Autumn, 1903: Hey, I'm just going by the evidence here. 1. The link 2. Russia not doing anything to stop you. 3. My accusal met no denial. 4. Russia only even spoke right after I accused you. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but again, I'm just going by what I know.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: The evidence seems obvious. Is it true? are you multiaccounting? If not, just say it.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: No, I'm not. 1. What link? 2. Russia COULDN'T do anything to stop me (he built fleets instead of armies) 3. I'm denying it! 4. No idea. 5. I'm not playing in any other games with Russia, and I've been playing here for months. Frankly I'm insulted that you've picked on me to accuse, and apart from being sore that you're being invaded by everyone whereas I've grown quite nicely, I see absolutely no reason for it. And France, "the evidence seems obvious" - what evidence? I've seen no evidence whatsoever, and the accusations seem transparent and vacuous.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: Check this out: http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=6466 Here Grikovien plays with multiaccounting and the winner is...? the account he's using currently. The obvious evidence is: take that game, now check this one. Grikovien helps Turkey but stops the rest of players. When Turkey attacks, he retreats, when other players attack he stays resisting. Weird right? Well, the multiaccounting idea came obviously because Grikovien is multiaccounting. Why not again? why not being such as obvious as this? Now, be sincere, pretend you were any of us, what would you think of your behaviour? isn't it weird? But if you say you're not multiaccounting and Grikovien is just a noob, I'll accept it. What do you say Grikovien? Any apologies?
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: I've seen n00bs do similar things before. But to be fair, there was nothing he could do to stop me - he simply didn't have the units. And as for resisting everyone else? He didn't put up any resistance to England either.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: Look that might be a little bit harsh.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: I'm not muti accounting I swear. That game with 7 Griks was simply me trying to figure out how to play and I didn't get any of the points from that game because I never finished it, basically all seven Griks got their points back. And I have nothing to do with Turkey, I lost this game fair and square.
09 Dec 08 UTC	Spring, 1904: Everything clear then.