Welcome, Guest -
(Log on)
- Autumn, 2013, Finished)
| 01 Jul 10 UTC | Spring, 2000: [Libya]:what the fuck do I do? |
| 01 Jul 10 UTC | Spring, 2000: [Libya]:I have a deal for anyone who wants to travel to algeria with me |
| 10 Jul 10 UTC | Autumn, 2004: [India]:Well i fucked myself. |
| 11 Jul 10 UTC | Autumn, 2004: [Pacific-Russia]:thats nice |
| 20 Jul 10 UTC | Autumn, 2008: [South-Africa]:Greetings all, just joined taking over an empty seat, please do message me as I have no idea what the last player was up to and must reassess the situation and renegotiate agreements with all nations. Cheers! |
| 29 Jul 10 UTC | Autumn, 2012: [Western-Canada]:how many for a win? |
| 29 Jul 10 UTC | Autumn, 2012: [Europe]:44 :) |
| 29 Jul 10 UTC | Spring, 2013: [South-Africa]:Fun times. Does anyone else feel like this map really favors South Africa and Argentina, and Brazil too if they're savvy? Southern hemisphere seems to have an advantage. I've seen Quebec win a few times too, their home center feeder system is pretty great, can easily control the Atlantic. I think India and Libya have potential too due to home center placement but for some reason I haven't seen them win very much. Cheers |
| 30 Jul 10 UTC | Spring, 2013: [Quebec]:libya is not that great of a start, they are surrounded and have a poor deployement location. i do think that oz brazil argentina kenya and south africa have pretty good starting location. even russia, they can take 4 SCs right off the bat (assuming the pac russia does not move in) congratulations on the win |
| 30 Jul 10 UTC | Spring, 2013: [Pacific-Russia]:yeh and this map is really bad if you USA CHINA or EUROPE i have never seen any of them do well |
| 30 Jul 10 UTC | Spring, 2013: [Quebec]:i have seen USA do well once but that was when all of NA was allied together... |
| 09 Aug 10 UTC | [South-Africa]:they should have a continue button... take over the whole world |