| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: persia, you take cyprus/tyre i take jerusalem? |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: persia, you take cyprus/tyre i take jerusalem? |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: Greece, thoughts on Dalmatia? |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: persia want to split asia minor I take byzantium and chersonesus you take miletus and sinope? |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: ok |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: I take dal you take vind and dmz dal, vind, ven and illyria? |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: why not split byzantium+miletus and chersonesus+sinope? that builds in a DMZ and makes it harder to... betray each other |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: I was hoping to take Dalmatia if that's all right with you |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: cause chersonesus is a big deal for greece in lets plays I have been in |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: Keeping Illyria and Epirus as DMZ |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: I mean I am not fine with that right now |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: yes because it gives you a strong position over persia and sorta quick access to rome. either way, persia, i wanna split along tyre/jeru |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Spring, 1: I mean I am not fine with that right now |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: Well it's useless just to bounce |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: carthage isn't hear you get tons of land rome and don't half to fight for it lets not fight over dal right now and you get big early game advantage |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: i mean it guarantees that it remains neutral |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: Egypt will get more out of a dead Carthage than I will |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: Not that there's anything wrong with that! |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: carthage isn't hear you get tons of land rome and don't half to fight for it lets not fight over dal right now and you get big early game advantage |
| 18 May 18 UTC |
Autumn, 1: still I will have little way of expansion not through a player and you are good for all of western Europe so I am not changing my stance |
- Autumn, 6, Finished