Finished: 08 PM Tue 31 Oct 17 UTC
sunrisers hyderbad 45
1 day, 12 hours /phase
Pot: 50 D - Spring, 10, Finished
The Ancient Mediterranean, Public messaging only, Draw-Size Scoring
1 excused missed turn
Game drawn

< Return

Chat archive

1
Country:


27 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: Good luck everyone. If anyone wants to work with me, let me know.
27 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: I am also open to an alliance
27 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: So, Persia. Are you moving mainly North or South?
27 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: I haven't really decided anything yet. I'm just gonna try and claim the neutral centers closest to me. Which way I try to expand depends on what makes the most logical sense.
27 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: Greece, I purpose that we work together, as opposed to fighting over the two territories that lie in between us. I would take Vind and leave Dal for you to take without any opposition
27 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: Okay, I accept. Let's not move into the Ionian Sea, aye?
28 Sep 17 UTC Spring, 1: i agree
28 Sep 17 UTC Autumn, 1: ... I may have forgotten to change a move...
28 Sep 17 UTC Autumn, 1: i still plan on taking Vind and leaving Dal for you to take
28 Sep 17 UTC Autumn, 1: Thanks~
01 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Hey Greece. I've got nothing against you. A war between us would be a waste. Even though you made good relations with Rome, I consider you stop working with him as you and Carthage could work VERY well together against him.
01 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Yes, but in the same vein, me and Egypt could do well together against Persia.

Rome, do you want Chersonesus?
01 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Egypt is getting attacked by Carthage. He has to at least try to defend himself from him so again, the smarter play is to go against Rome.
01 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Carthage's troops have to handle Rome and Egypt's forces. They are both in the same boat as far as flanks go. Rome and Greece have the advantage of only focusing on one battle at a time, and I'm sure both of us would prefer to keep it that way.
01 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: no, i can help you into Cherosonesus iff you need though
02 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Ahh, thank you
02 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Hi Egypt,

My suggestion with your position is that you retreat to Egyptian sea and disband one of your units around me. You've got your hads full with Carthage and he should be able to handle Rome as well. Greece has the benefit of having nobody want to attack him. I suggest we work on him. I attacked Cyprus because it was obvious you were attacking Jerusalem. I'm proposing we stop fighting and maybe start helping each other. I'd also suggest Rome stab Greece because it is pretty clear he is not going to do very well against Carthage.
02 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: There is no reason for Rome and Greece to fight when our forces can be focused on one enemy. With Persia crippling a potential ally, the fall will be expected shortly. I myself have no desire to turn against an ally, and I hope Rome feels the same way, at least until the last of our enemies are dead.
02 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: And after Carthage takes Egypt...do you think Rome will be able to stand up to him alone? Leptis and Cyrene will likely fall within the next year.

Egypt-again, lets stop fighting. My suggestion would be that you work with me against Greece. It can bring you back into the game...
02 Oct 17 UTC Autumn, 2: Do you think I will leave my ally alone in their time of need? Is that how low you think I would sink?

1