Messages - webDiplomacy

Chat archive

13 Apr 15 UTC	Autumn, 2: Greece - Persia alliance.
13 Apr 15 UTC	Autumn, 2: All. Hail. Carthage.
13 Apr 15 UTC	Autumn, 2: Yes indeed! I think that sounds rather wonderful, come on people all hail me.
15 Apr 15 UTC	Autumn, 3: Carthage, Egypt, and Greece. You are all really, painfully awful. Persia, GG.
15 Apr 15 UTC	Autumn, 3: someone's a sore loser
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: Pjsalty
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: Pjsalty
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: Pjsalty
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: Pjsalty
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: Pjsalty?
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: sorry, someone else typed that on my account
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: What does it even mean?
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: And also I'd like to say something: I think Carthage is retarded because I told him like three turns ago to take my stuff. In place of just taking it like I asked he started saying that he wasn't going to and then started bashfully moving his stuff into an obvious stab position. Not only that, it was an obvious stab that if I was still playing I could have countered. I think Greece is retarded because he willingly gave up a winning front for an absence of growth on another front. I don't think he understands the game very well, and he might be the most easily manipulated person I've seen in the community. I think Egypt just has bad luck, but he could have pulled things off a lot better if he had committed to literally any of his attacks in place of just randomly moving around and then getting slapped around when he didn't obtain any defensible territory. Looking at it now, he did something very similar to what Greece did which is why Persia is the likely winner. Persia did exactly what everyone who plays as Persia usually does. This is why I don't dislike Persia. I'm still giving all my stuff to Carthage because he is going to be the only one who will make Persia need to earn his victory in place of just getting it on a silver plate, even if it will only be minor resistance at this point.
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: What about yourself?
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: I over-react. Assuming nobody does anything stupid (not meaning people can't attack me, but when attacking me is a bad move for both me AND the person attacking me I'll never understand it) I usually fare well in games.
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: I've been keeping track of people I can't trust's usernames. It actually won me a couple games when I played against them the next time. Should help in reduction.
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: What do you mean by "people you can't trust"? Backstabbing is part of the game.
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: Lol, by not trust I don't mean backstabs. I expect backstabs. I trust my that if my allies are worth their salt they'll try to backstab me when least I want them to. When I say trust I mean trust to not fail spectacularly. They know when to move or when to hold, what to support, ect. When people flail around the board aimlessly or switch between attack plans widely then I add them to the list. Also, any boneheaded moves (See Greece movements Autumn 2 for example) gets an addition to the list. I dislike playing with and against people who don't know how to play. I dislike when a game is painfully easy (See Greece movements Autumn 2) or aggravatingly difficult (See Greece movements Spring 2).
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: I like balanced games where everyone knows how to play and everyone actually moves, where people don't whine halfway through to get a draw, and where people understand the difference between a global front and a front.
16 Apr 15 UTC	Spring, 4: I've never heard an adult complain so much about something that matters so little. If you've given up then stop polluting the message board with you BS.