28 Aug 14 UTC | Spring, 1999: gl hf |
19 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2007: And now, we have four. |
19 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2007: I mean. Technically Cali & Tex are still in this |
19 Sep 14 UTC | Autumn, 2007: True but barring a Jannisary strategy for either player, the last turn pretty much rendered us four effective powers. |
19 Sep 14 UTC | Autumn, 2007: Oh look, Texas is on the run. Would be a real shame if that army just kept cause trouble in your back end Quebec |
19 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2008: Oh he will that unit has gone rogue..Command and control in Dallas no control. |
24 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2010: GameMaster: Minhoto was banned: Multi. The time until the next phase has been extended by one phase length to give an opportunity to replace the player. Remember to finalize your orders if you don't want to wait, so the game isn't held up unnecessarily! |
25 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2010: Haha, Manitoba and Monatana look a bit similar if you're not paying enough attention! |
25 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2010: OMG......what a time to lose Peru! |
28 Sep 14 UTC | Autumn, 2011: Well played Texas! |
28 Sep 14 UTC | Autumn, 2011: Thank you..This should be an interesting finish without peru. |
28 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2012: Nothing interesting about it.....can't stalemate in the Pacific in time without Peru. Its a Q win. |
29 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2015: I'm ready to throw in the towel. With Peru around the game could at least been brought to a stalemate. Without Peru, its just dragging on the inevitable. |
29 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2015: It's 34 depots to win, right? If so it won't happen this year, but it could happen next. |
30 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2017: You like stretching this out? Could have closed that season! |
30 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2017: I predicted wrong in Tennessee and it effected my strategy. Sorry. |
30 Sep 14 UTC | Spring, 2017: No worries.....teasing is all I have left to heal my bruised ego! Hate pulling a loss out of a solid, earned draw. |
01 Oct 14 UTC | Spring, 2017: In all fairness, if Peru wouldn't have been banned, it would have been at least a draw. |
01 Oct 14 UTC | Spring, 2017: I don't think that is certain. The moment I finished with the rogue Texas unit I would have broken through LA. It became much easier, but a stalemate was never a guarantee |
01 Oct 14 UTC | Spring, 2017: It was....there were sufficient Peruvian fleets to reach a Pacific bottleneck. You would have made progress by land in the middle, but with both oceans stuck, you could not have taken the interior coasts backed by fleets. |