http://i.imgur.com/RZM33.gif

And while we're at it, I heard "It's a Wonderful Life" is blatant socialist propaganda...

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18ha1ok4nw0z1jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg

Slightly NSFW.

Well I just learned what NSFW stood for... That was a really crappy post 2WL... -.-

It disparages communism AND capitalism...

Obvious dark satire of the 1917 Revolution and Stalinist Russia, but then Orwell also makes a point of making monetary exchanges on the part of the pigs and human beings a major cause of their corruption and cruelty towards the other animals...

"Somehow it seemed as though the farm had grown richer without making the animals themselves any richer — except, of course, for the pigs and the dogs."

The more money and affluence they get, the more they want, until Orwell's final sentence--

"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

What's more, Orwell himself identified as a Democratic Socialist...

So he's hardly the kind of guy who's ideology would get him invited on to guest sit for Alex Jones or Rush Limbaugh.

You mean to tell me that MSNBC employs stupid people?

No...

Yeah obi is right, it's both. Isn't it made all but obvious from the text? Not exactly a subtle book.

It's both, but it's not one. The point of the story is that she excluded the anti-communist ideas and only mentioned the anti-capitalist ideas because it's MSNBC, and as much as I hate Fox News, MSNBC is getting closer and closer to them as time goes by.

well yeah, tv news is a god-awful echo chamber. my roommate was watching jon stewart the other day, i listened in for a sec.

pretty dismaying stuff. very simplistic, very parochial, very tribalist. i dont know what i expected lol

And yet Jon Stewart is often more accurate than actual news.

She's right, so that's a thing. Also, isn't the daily Caller Tucker Carlson's little shitrag?

You know Jon Stewart is replacing Letterman, right? Proof positive The Daily Show was *not* an actual news program, but entertainment for the libtard masses.

Colbert is replacing Letterman, not Stewart, and nobody ever claimed that Stewart doesn't have clear leanings. He makes good points and he's funny, and that's all there really is to it.

Oops, yeah Colbert. But it still proves the point as he is on the show.

If only I had a dollar for every time someone said libtard on this site...

lol draug i will say this for stewart - he always maintained he was not a news program, but a comedy show. some with colbert, who is the real replacement, as ghug says.

but yes it is entertainment for the libtard masses. "jon stewart democrats" are the most annoying breed of leftist. especially because they think they are worldly for watching jon stewart, lmao.

that being said, one of stewart's oldest jokes is that his comedy show is more accurate than fox's news shows. he's right on that count, and his taunts ring true.

but i don't really watch any of those shows, or any shows for that matter, so i don't really know.

did you guys know they already replaced Leno? lol i thought that was going to happen next year or something

On the Daily Show? Colbert has had his own show for years, dude. Check your facts before making vague claims that, while technically true, mean next to nothing.

Thucy, Leno left in 2009...

No, never mind, the show cut in 2009. He left a few months back. I thought that sounded funny when I said that...

ghug are you talking to me? what are you responding to that i said? i know colbert has his own show lol

Ghug, just because he left doesn't mean I can't reference his time on the show as proof of its ljbtard agenda.

I was responding to Draug, we crossposted.

Draug, it's not a "libjard [sic I guess?] agenda," it's a comedy show with clearly leftist leanings. I don't watch Stewart that often, but when I do it's because he's funny, not because I'm trying to get the news. And the guy does make plenty of valid points, you just have to keep in mind that there's a clear and publicly acknowledged bias.

If your going to [sic] a typo, at least have the courtesy of properly quoting it. I substituted a j for an I, not a t. :-)

I know it is an admitted bias, but the libtards here seem to want to refer to his show as a news show and give it a legitimacy that the show itself doesn't claim.

No, when liberals talk about its legitimacy, it's almost always along the lines of "isn't it sad that Fox News is on par with The Daily Show?" It's not a claim of legitimacy, it's pointing out other illegitimacy. The show runs on Comedy Central for God's sake.

And I really have no defense for my improper [sic]ing, except that you were using the word "libtard," which makes you sound like, well, krellin. You're better than krellin. Come on.

No-one is better than krellin at what krellin does best.

I find it mysterious that Krellin hasn't made his appearance in this thread yet.

krellin is a figment of the imagination

he only exists when we invoke him.

for when two or three are gathered in liberalism's name - he is there among them