@pastralan
that's not entirely accurate. We haven't had a scientific method for analyzing our universe until the last few centuries. Religions texts are riddled with inaccuracies that today, are easy to identify. I've still yet to see any literal reading of a religious text that holds up.
Secondly, I PERSONALLY don't have to spend 80 years of my life investigating every single aspect, as there are many critiques you can find today given the vastness of the internet. It's the age of information, and there are more collections of arguments and counterarguments or religious doctrines at our fingertips than ever before.
I've watched plenty of debates and read my fair share as well. Perhaps there are defenses of religions that I haven't heard yet, but simply from the MANY inaccuracies already that have been identified, I've still been yet to see a religion that holds it's worth in salt.
I don't have to prove a null by saying there's no god with religion. I'm not entirely against the idea of some sort of deity, though the likelihood of it i would call into question (unitarians would probably touch closest on this). However, Religions make specific claims about our nature, the world, and history, that are scientifically inaccurate. Because of this, I have great skepticism in the accuracy of religions.
What they teach in terms of moral values i can appreciate.