We've now raised over $2500 toward our donation target goal for site improvements. Thank you for all the generosity shown! Please see this thread for more details.
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Start a new discussion in the public forum
Post a new thread
If your post relates to a particular game please include the URL or ID#
of the game.
We get a lot of feature requests. If your feature request isn't already on our issue tracker,
then the best place to ask is the forum. This will help us gauge support for your ideas, before we add it to the todo list.
If you are posting a question please check the FAQ before posting.
If your message is long you may need to write a summary message, and add the full message as a reply.
I want to learn how to code, but am having trouble deciding where to start. Their are many free resources, online classes, boot camps, etc. I would prefer to teach myself, but lack the knowledge to know what language I should be learning first and so on. Any tips from the experienced code writers here on WebDip?
Is there a rule against holding a stalemate indefinitely even though the situation is clear? I think he's hoping the rest of us give up and leave, which if it isn't against the rules yet then it should be.
I don't particularly care for PPSC. But saw that another thread was having this discussion as a sidebar and thought it fair to start a discussion thread. There is reasonable support for PPSC and regardless of the majority opinion the minority's should be heard.
I don’t know if this has been suggested but: 1. In draws have everyone alive share the pot equally (As they should because SoS is garbage) 2. In a solo, the soloist gains a portion of the pot equal to 18* divided by the number of centers controlled by the soloist or survivors (but not neutral centers or those of resigned powers) and the survivors split the remainder proportionally based on their center count. *Or however many
@"DammmmDaniel (163 D) 04:43 PM +1 Gosh Bo people are just so disrespectful these days.... Tell me can we not use libtard because it offends people who are mentally retarded? If so I hardly blame you for it.I doubt that any retarded person would be caught dead associating with liberals. They aren't stupid."
No really, using ableist language is messed up. You should use slurs based on things people are born with. Be it 'race', sexuality, mental/physical disability. You should only criticise people for things they choose - like using the word 'libtard'/gay/N- when they know it is offensive. (I will forever criticise you for saying 'i know it upsets people, but i don't care about people.')
"A burglar broke into my house last night! We got robbed and I'm furious!" "Hey, at least he didn't murder you while you slept and burned your beds, then burned down all the houses across the neighborhood." "What?" "I'm just saying it could have been worse. It's pretty mild for a burglar."
I watched the presser from yesterday finally. Trump didn't come off as so anti-media as people are indicating here. He was just pissed at Buzzfeed for putting out fake news and refused to talk to them. If anyone else had asked the same question, I think he might have answered it.
No slypups Trump is obviously a monster who is orchestrating a grand scheme to become a dictator of America once and for all. Get with the program. Wont bother responding to Orothaic as James did so perfectly (plus one for you James) Honestly at this point it is just about analyzing Trump incredibly harshly till we manage to find a flaw with what he did.