Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 319 of 412
FirstPreviousNextLast
brainbomb (474 D)
18 Jun 16 UTC
College World Series - Predictions
Game 1 Oklahoma State vs University of Cal. Santa Barbara.
Game 2 Miami vs Arizona
Game 3 Texas Christian vs Texas Tech
Game 4 Florida vs Coastal Carolina.
5 replies
Open
Franz_o_Sissy (292 D)
17 Jun 16 UTC
Nuby - Nobie to this site
As of yesterday I have joined DiplomacyWeb. Also started a game right off, but I haven't got a clue how the digital side of playing is run.
Can anyone inform me (in the FAQ there wasn't any discription as to e.g. who is alotted to which country, where is the TAB to decide whether contestants can or can't mail to each other, etc) ?
7 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (141 D)
16 Jun 16 UTC
British MP murdered in right-wing terror attack
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/jo-cox-shot-live-latest-news-updates-birstall-shooting-stabbing-labour-mp-west-yorkshire-a7085561.html
60 replies
Open
principians (871 D)
20 Jun 16 UTC
(+1)
Once again, mexican gov. shooting civilians
And maybe you won't watch in the news, nor see any 'prayformexico' hashtag as the 'prayforvenezuela' one...

Maybe you don't give a shit, buy just so you know
5 replies
Open
Frost_Faze (102 D)
18 Jun 16 UTC
7 more players!!!
Need 7 more players, http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=180330 modern diplomacy!
0 replies
Open
Wanted: Thoughtful Discussion
I'm working on a project where I have to document the process of having a discussion with someone whose views I disagree with. The point of the assignment is to examine my own biases, and find ways to address them. So, since I consider myself liberal in most social and economic policy, I'm looking for an open-minded conservative to debate and discuss politics with. If you're interested, shoot me a PM. Thanks.
35 replies
Open
eturnage (601 D (B))
14 Jun 16 UTC
Beekeeping: What is Your Favorite Style of Bee Husbandry?
Hello. Are there any other beekeepers among us? I've been working Warre style hives in Lang medium, 8-frame boxes at my place here in western NC.
16 replies
Open
Bob the Lord (297 D)
17 Jun 16 UTC
Oh Magical Mods
Could you pause a game, as I won't be here this weekend?
9 replies
Open
Frost_Faze (102 D)
17 Jun 16 UTC
Come Join Modern Diplomacy II
Hey guys, come join this new game.
gameID=180306
Modern Diplomacy II must have 34% reliability at least.
0 replies
Open
Fluminator (496 D)
30 May 16 UTC
(+5)
MXX: Trouble in Amish Paradise
We're at 20 folks!
3045 replies
Open
WiseJazzer (95 D)
16 Jun 16 UTC
Supporting others on a Gunboat
Is it common to order support to a move from some player against another player on a Gunboat game?
4 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D (B))
15 Jun 16 UTC
Liberal Brains vs Conservative Brains
Because this came up elsewhere...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kI-un8rHP14
28 replies
Open
brainbomb (474 D)
15 Jun 16 UTC
Working on a new album
So ive been recording a ton this summer. Heres some of my new songs: https://m.soundcloud.com/mothlion
8 replies
Open
CommanderByron (869 D (S))
16 Jun 16 UTC
Ecuador V USA
21:30 UTC -5

Anyone down to live discuss?
2 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (141 D)
16 Jun 16 UTC
Voting in 1970s Britain
An interesting article about the 1975 referendum:

http://scarfolk.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/voting-in-1970s.html
0 replies
Open
Bob the Lord (297 D)
11 Jun 16 UTC
(+1)
Favourite Ancient Empires
Byzantine.
33 replies
Open
Maniac (344 D (B))
12 Jun 16 UTC
(+2)
Gun control
Webdip has changed so much, back in the day after a mass shooting we'd have a thread within a minute, argue for days and then nothing would get done. Now we just leap straight to doing nothing. I miss the old times.
283 replies
Open
Valis2501 (2057 D (G))
14 Jun 16 UTC
Classic Game LF5M
A user has asked me to advertise their anonymous game which includes two coworkers.
5 replies
Open
brainbomb (474 D)
14 Jun 16 UTC
(+2)
Glass Eating: What is your favorite glass eating experience?
Im looking to get into competitive glass eating. Was wondering if anyone on webdip has done this and what the best venues are for glass eating.
12 replies
Open
rm63 (100 D)
13 Jun 16 UTC
NEW ENGLAND PLAYER WANTED FOR WWI TEAM GAME!
England has gone into civil disorder so we need a new English player. This is a team game where the allies (Britain, France and Russia) fight the axis (Germany, Austria and Turkey).. England has missed a couple of phases but is still in a good position. The game ID is 179879. It is called "World War One team game". The password for the game is "shellshock". Once you have joined have a look at the other thread on the forum called "WWI team game" to get familiar with the rules.
8 replies
Open
MKECharlie (1926 D (G))
14 Jun 16 UTC
Fencing: What is your favorite weapon, and why?
Also, if you're American, did you vote in the recent USFA election? Do you think it'll have any affect on the tournament selection process in the New Jersey division?
6 replies
Open
JEccles (425 D)
14 Jun 16 UTC
New Classic Game
Just started this up. 50 point buy in, anon, 1 day phases.

http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=180213
0 replies
Open
c0dyz (100 D)
14 Jun 16 UTC
Farewell
Farewell kind folk. Summer approaches and my school friends and I will depart from the merry making until next year.
3 replies
Open
principians (871 D)
07 Jun 16 UTC
There are muslim creationists too
An I found very funny that they deny the big bang too https://www.scienceislam.com/pdf/Big_Bang.pdf
65 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (141 D)
11 Jun 16 UTC
Sanders voters disenfranchied in California
Anyone in the US know how accurate this report is?

http://www.gregpalast.com/california-stolen-sanders-right-nowspecial-bulletin-greg-palast/
bo_sox48 (4499 D Mod (G))
11 Jun 16 UTC
I don't know how accurate his characterization of the ballots in California is, but yes, there are still many uncounted California votes and there has been speculation on both sides that a lot of votes are "lost" somehow. I don't know why this is a big story, though. It's been going on throughout this entire primary cycle and it seems like people only start complaining once it happens to them rather than getting up in arms about it earlier in the primary. From purging voters to canceling exit polling to malfunctioning voter machines, much of the Democratic primary has been a wreck and reeks of election fraud regardless of who wins and who loses.
leon1122 (101 D)
11 Jun 16 UTC
(+1)
I still remember when the wise webDippers were telling us how Sanders was sure to win when he was 200 pledged delegates behind and how he was entering "friendly territory".
Tolstoy (2033 D)
11 Jun 16 UTC
I've lived and voted in California all my life, and dabbled in politics from time to time. None of this surprises me. The paper-shufflers in the Registrar of Voters' offices who control the elections are Democratic Party loyalists to a (wo)man. They openly bash Republicans, "lose" paperwork to keep candidates opposing the Democratic Party machine off the ballot, and there are inevitably all sorts of "glitches" with the computers on election nights that, once fixed, "corrects" the results so the appropriate candidate wins. Polling place chicanery like this is nothing new. In the 2008 primary for instance, poll workers were I lived were telling voters that Ron Paul had dropped out (he hadn't) and they couldn't vote for him, even though he was on the ballot. It's no wonder the Democratic Party has such a stranglehold on the state.
bo_sox48 (4499 D Mod (G))
11 Jun 16 UTC
It's more of a problem that the AP called the race the night before the largest amount of delegates were to be distributed in a single day and that the rest of the mass media followed suit and broadcasted their report. What happened to journalistic integrity? What happened to letting the voters vote? The media controls elections. The parties can only fuck with things so much. It's no surprise that, despite supposedly record breaking registration numbers in California, there were 28% fewer votes cast at the polls than there were in 2008.
I don't ever recall hearing "sure to win." More like "still has a chance to win," at least in the discussions I followed.
Gobbledydook (1389 D (B))
12 Jun 16 UTC
Sanders was toast regardless, don't fool yourself into thinking that if there were less irregularities that he would have won.
Until OP started this thread, I had never heard of Greg Palast. It looks like he has received acclaim for investigative journalism on some prior matters, including election fraud in Florida.

As to whether the subject matter of the linked report is accurate, it is difficult to say. Almost all of the readily available information on the internet links back to Palast's report (as opposed to independently verifiable data), or duplicate postings on other websites -- with or without accreditation to Palast. In particular, many sites quote identical language from a report by Baxter Dmitry. http://yournewswire.com/california-primary-results-in-voter-suppression-election-fraud/ One of these two, Palast or Dmitry, is plagiarizing the other. I'll give Palast the benefit of the doubt that he is the original.

For being a flashy "look at me, I'm Sam Spade" investigative journalist, Palast does shoddy work in this expose. There is little accreditation for his sources. For example, Palast says "Poll worker Jeff Lewis filed a description of the training in an official declaration to a federal court" -- what case? what court? I was able to find only one federal lawsuit related to 2016 California election fraud: Voting Rights Defense Project, et al. v. Depuis, et al., filed in USDC for the Northern District of California on 5/20/16 (almost three weeks before the California primary). The case sought an extension of voter registration, and was rejected by Hon. William Alsup a week before the primary. There does not appear to be any declaration from a Jeff Lewis in that case.

Regardless, the quoted text of Lewis' declaration does not necessarily match Palast's interpretation or the general theme of Palast's report. If someone asks where the presidential candidates are on an NPP ballot, the purported instructed response is that NPP ballots do not have presidential candidates on them. This is true. That is not the same thing as saying "NPP voters can't get Democratic ballots" when an NPP voter asks "how do I get to vote in the Democratic party primary?"

Palast accurately quotes the California Election Officer Training Manual at page 49: "A No Party Preference voter will need to request a crossover ballot from the Roster Index Officer. (Do not offer them a crossover ballot if they do not ask)." That is not the same as Palast's interpretation: "They are ordered not to breathe a word that the voter can get a “crossover” ballot that includes the presidential race."

Compare the California Secretary of State's website (http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/political-parties/no-party-preference/). It states: "How to request a party ballot? The NPP voter may ask their county elections office or poll worker, at their polling place, for a ballot for one of the above three parties. An NPP voter may not request more than one party's ballot."

To me, it seems pretty straightforward. If you're registered NPP, you are allowed to vote in the Democratic primary (but not the Republican, because the GOP does not authorize that). The default is that you are given an NPP ballot. The NPP ballot does not have presidential candidates on it. If a voter asks where the presidential candidates are, the election worker's response is that an NPP ballot does not contain presidential candidates. If a voter asks for a Democratic ballot, he or she is given (a "crossover") one. If a voter does not ask for a Democratic ballot, election workers are not supposed to give one or suggest there is an alternate option.

That does not sound fraudulent or nefarious to me. If Palast is onto something, he should do a better job articulating it and citing support.
eturnage (601 D (B))
12 Jun 16 UTC
The issue is the First Amendment Right of Association. The Democratic Party is a private organization. Why should it be forced to let independent voters help it to pick a standard bearer for the general election? There are Supreme Court cases on this subject.
I don't think that's the issue. Nobody is saying that the a Democratic Party should be forced to let non-Democrats vote in its primary. The DP already voluntarily agreed to do so. The issue is whether voters who wanted to vote in the Democratic primary and were allowed to do so by the DP were improperly precluded from doing so.

I do think it's odd that you don't need to be a Democrat to vote in the primary. It would make things a lot simpler if all parties had closed primaries and part of the cost of registering NPP was exclusion from all party primaries.
bo_sox48 (4499 D Mod (G))
12 Jun 16 UTC
Excluding upwards of 40% of the country's voters in the name of simplicity is not the best way to put forward the best candidate to win the general election.
eturnage (601 D (B))
12 Jun 16 UTC
Winning the general election is an argument for selecting a moderate. However, if you're a true believer in the DP principles you believe a strong principled standard bearer who will advocate for the party ideals will win.
bo_sox48 (4499 D Mod (G))
12 Jun 16 UTC
Or you can accept that you can't win if independent voters aren't at least somewhat behind your principles, therefore keeping your platform and ideals fluid depending on the mood of your populace.
Jamiet99uk (141 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
"The NPP ballot does not have presidential candidates on it."

Can someone explain this to me? What candidates ARE on the NPP ballot? Is it just a blank piece of paper?
leon1122 (101 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
Senators, judges, etc.
Jamiet99uk (141 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
They have primaries for judges?
leon1122 (101 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
http://www.voteforjudges.org/
Tolstoy (2033 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
"What candidates ARE on the NPP ballot?"

Here in California, the voters in their infinite wisdom decided to institute the Jungle Primary system, where all candidates for all offices appear on everyone's ballot (except for President, which remained semi-closed). The only difference between a NPP ballot and any other ballot is which candidates appear for President.

The jungle primary, combined with the state's gerrymandered districts and the complete disorganization of the Republican Party, produces a lot of contests in the general election between two candidates of the same party (usually two Democrats).
Jamiet99uk (141 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
What a weird system you colonials have.


18 replies
rm63 (100 D)
06 Jun 16 UTC
New World War I team game - played as 2 teams. Starting soon!
I've been wanting to do this for a long time. I'm not sure if it's been done before. Apologies if it's already been done. I've created a game called "WWI team game" and the idea is that we will recreate world war one by playing the game as 2 teams; the triple alliance consisting of Austria, Germany and turkey and the triple entente consisting of England, France and Russia.
31 replies
Open
brainbomb (474 D)
12 Jun 16 UTC
College World Series
Starts June 18th. Definetely as far as atmosphere it is among the finest sports events in the country every year. And its right here in Omaha.
3 replies
Open
ssorenn (2550 D (G))
09 Jun 16 UTC
3 game gunboat tourney
post here or PM me if interested
22 replies
Open
SLOTerp (100 D)
11 Jun 16 UTC
NWO: Mushroom clouds forecasted in coming year.
The NWO game at Redscape is about to get a bit radioactive. If you haven't seen or played this massive variant, take a look. The GM and a few players put out some high quality press as well.
http://www.redscape.com/viewforum.php?f=141
0 replies
Open
Musoeun (133 D)
10 Jun 16 UTC
(Poll) How Many Draws Equal a Solo
I'm working on a project (may submit it to a zine, may just be for my own amusement) and I'm trying to find out what various Diplomacy communities view as the relationship in accomplishment between draws and solo victories.
20 replies
Open
Page 319 of 412
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top