Page 9 of 97
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:33 am
by PRINCE WILLIAM
159 The year Emperor Gordian was born.
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 4:28 pm
by Octavious
Treble 20, Treble 20, Double Top.
My favourite finish :)
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 4:36 pm
by tobieee911
Octavious wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 4:28 pm
Treble 20, Treble 20, Double Top.
My favourite finish :)
Woohoo another one who plays darts? :)
161, Treble 20, Treble 17 and dubble bull :)
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 7:42 pm
by FlaviusAetius
162, the section that allows you to do deductions in taxes in the USA!!
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:02 am
by damo666
Lord of Broken Plains wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 11:11 pm
137
This number is prime, as are its digits 1,3 and 7, and for bonus points as is the sum of this set (11)
1 is not prime
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:09 am
by damo666
I demand recognition and equal rights for 153
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:58 pm
by FlaviusAetius
1 is prime and 164 agrees!
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 3:21 pm
by tobieee911
FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:58 pm
1 is prime and 164 agrees!
Nope, 1 is not prime
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 5:33 pm
by Foxcastle
tobieee911 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 3:21 pm
FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:58 pm
1 is prime and 164 agrees!
Nope, 1 is not prime
“If the definition of a prime number were changed to call 1 prime, many statements involving prime numbers would need to be reworded in a more awkward way. For example, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic would need to be rephrased in terms of factorizations into primes greater than 1, because every number would have multiple factorizations with different numbers of copies of 1. Similarly, the sieve of Eratosthenes would not work correctly if it handled 1 as a prime, because it would eliminate all multiples of 1 (that is, all other numbers) and output only the single number 1. Some other more technical properties of prime numbers also do not hold for the number 1: for instance, the formulas for Euler's totient function or for the sum of divisors function are different for prime numbers than for 1. By the early 20th century, mathematicians began to agree that 1 should not be listed as prime, but rather in its own special category as a "unit".”
This clarification is 165 words long.
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:03 pm
by damo666
Foxcastle wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 5:33 pm
tobieee911 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 3:21 pm
FlaviusAetius wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 2:58 pm
1 is prime and 164 agrees!
Nope, 1 is not prime
“If the definition of a prime number were changed to call 1 prime, many statements involving prime numbers would need to be reworded in a more awkward way. For example, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic would need to be rephrased in terms of factorizations into primes greater than 1, because every number would have multiple factorizations with different numbers of copies of 1. Similarly, the sieve of Eratosthenes would not work correctly if it handled 1 as a prime, because it would eliminate all multiples of 1 (that is, all other numbers) and output only the single number 1. Some other more technical properties of prime numbers also do not hold for the number 1: for instance, the formulas for Euler's totient function or for the sum of divisors function are different for prime numbers than for 1. By the early 20th century, mathematicians began to agree that 1 should not be listed as prime, but rather in its own special category as a "unit".”
This clarification is 165 words long.
Thanks Fox.
What happened 163?
Why don't people follow?
Can't you count?
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:04 pm
by damo666
1 is the only non prime non composite integer.
(btw)
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:28 pm
by Foxcastle
damo666 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:03 pm
Thanks Fox.
What happened 163?
Why don't people follow?
Can't you count?
I assumed
you mistyped and meant 163, which
Flavius ratified in taking us to 164.
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:07 pm
by e.m.c^42
165, around the number of bountiful opportunities foxC missed in turning down the information bargain.
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:14 pm
by Foxcastle
e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:07 pm
165, around the number of bountiful opportunities foxC missed in turning down the information bargain.
This was already posted. I see you're reading this thread as closely as you read mafia games!
(But let's not discuss an ongoing game.)
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:40 pm
by e.m.c^42
Foxcastle wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:14 pm
e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:07 pm
166, around the number of bountiful opportunities foxC missed in turning down the information bargain.
This was already posted. I see you're reading this thread as closely as you read mafia games! ;) (But let's not discuss an ongoing game.)
Absolutely. Let's retcon
167
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:50 pm
by FlaviusAetius
168, a number of posts I was never able to reach ;(
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:56 pm
by Chaqa
169
nice
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:16 pm
by Octavious
Treble 20, Treble 20, Bull
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:02 am
by PRINCE WILLIAM
171 ΒC Macedonian King Perseus defeats the Romans in the battle of Kallinicus.
Re: The Counting Game
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:12 pm
by e.m.c^42
172, approximately the number of characters in my current profile at time of posting after being divided by one-hundred sixty