Welcome, Guest -
(Log on)
- Spring, 2014, Finished| Spring, 2007: Salty little child, go cry somewhere else and stop being so pathetic | |
| Spring, 2007: More than double your centre count, but I'm stupid a terrible player... There's a level of maturity that usually comes with playing this game and for a while your press has shown you lack it. If you carry on in other games in the same way, I won't be the last to call you out and you'll probably find that any alliances you do make won't last long as you're so annoying |
|
| Spring, 2007: xD ofc if you play defensive all the game and them you betray me, ofc you will haved more supplys as me, is not about that you betray me is about your movement all the game, you dont attack no one, btw, gg wp guys | |
| Spring, 2007: Lmao none of that makes any sense, you're embarrassing yourself. I've taken more centres than you, moved further on the map than you and moved against more players than you - I'd also wager I've communicated more than you with the other players as well. So far you've been defeated in 56% of your games, mine is 23% and I've played over 4 times the amount you have. Stop acting like a petulant little sore loser and try to learn what the game is about, because it certainly isn't just "attacking" people - I'd recommend Brother Bored and there's 1 video by Matt Colville for if you also like TTRPG's. |
|
| Spring, 2007: GameMaster: Game was extended due to at least 1 member failing to enter orders and having an excused missed turn available. This has un-readied all orders. | |
| Spring, 2007: Hi, I'll help the game move along. | |
| Spring, 2007: Thanks, you're a good egg | |
| Spring, 2007: Cheers | |
| Autumn, 2007: xD, only the stupid player like mexico help someone who always attacked him, because he is a child xD | |
| Autumn, 2007: Yeah, we got past that through... DIPLOMACY! Funny that, huh? Maybe they should make a game about it or something... "Always" is a bit strong anyway, only recently and only 3 turns by my count. You're embarrassing yourself again, Heronickk. Come back in a few years, after you've matured a little. Name-calling because it's not going your way is beyond puerile, it's insanely ironic and hypocritical that you'd dare call someone else a stupid child. |
|
| Autumn, 2007: Fortnite seems more on your level. | |
| Autumn, 2007: Mexico is simply playing the game and playing it well. Diplomatic relationships are key. A good player is either capable of maintaining their original alliances or seamlessly shifting with minimal effort and developing new relationships, with both scenarios resulting in the player prospering. Communication and being attuned to the changing landscape of the game is key. Nothing silly or childish about how Mexico is playing. | |
| Autumn, 2007: Thank you BC, I appreciate it, but he's just salty. On the bright side, this is hopefully a learning experience for him | |
| Autumn, 2007: man wake up, what you make all the game is not DIPLOMACY, yo dont fight anywhere, what you talking about? he go against peru and come back he attack with 1 army to california and them go back into peru i really dont understand what you try to say or make really | |
| Autumn, 2007: This is pathetic. Look up what diplomacy the word means. Both it and the game aren't all about "attacking", as I've said before. Tell Cuba and the original Peru that I don't "fight" anywhere. Then could you tell me what it is you've contributed to this game? Even though you're wrong, by your own standards of how the game is supposedly played you have done worse than me - as well as when judged by how the game is actually meant to be played. Have you taken a centre that didn't start as neutral? Either way, you can't dictate how someone else plays. |
|
| Autumn, 2007: If you're referring to my play in terms of not fighting anywhere, I'm sure Quebec and NYC may have different thoughts. I thought what I offered was fairly self-explanatory. We are all entitled to play the game however we like or whatever style we choose. | |
| Autumn, 2007: By the way, what is the name of this game a reference to, if anything? | |
| Autumn, 2007: The prior exchanging word | |
| Autumn, 2007: Lol | |
| Spring, 2010: GameMaster: Game was extended due to at least 1 member failing to enter orders and having an excused missed turn available. This has un-readied all orders. | |
| Spring, 2010: New Heartland here boys | |
| Spring, 2010: Welcome buddy! | |
| Spring, 2010: I do not wish to continue the bad mouthing from the previous H. It will take some time to go thru the history of moves , press and relationships. Please send some direct press regarding how you see this game progressing |
|
| Spring, 2010: Welcome New Heartland. Don't worry, old Heartland came across as a gentleman so no bad mouthing to my knowledge! | |
| Spring, 2010: Welcome! I 2nd California. | |
| Spring, 2010: I also endorse that notion. | |
| Autumn, 2010: GameMaster: Game was extended due to at least 1 member failing to enter orders and having an excused missed turn available. This has un-readied all orders. | |
| Autumn, 2010: New Heartland here | |
| Autumn, 2010: Looks like we have been allies for a while I am here for the draw I will do my best to take Georgia |
|
| Autumn, 2010: Wow, our 3rd Heartland. Crazy for such a strong position! Welcome! |
|
| Autumn, 2010: I know thats really weird | |
| Autumn, 2010: I clearly joined at the wrong time | |
| Autumn, 2010: Haha couldn't have timed it worse! | |
| Autumn, 2012: Phew, at least I outlived Peru. I was starting to get worried there | |
| Autumn, 2012: It was a good run. Thanks all! | |
| Spring, 2013: Well played Peru. Thanks for joining the game! | |
| Autumn, 2013: Well played everybody, this game was great fun! | |
| Autumn, 2013: Thanks Florida. You played a great game. Until next time! :-) | |
| Autumn, 2013: Thanks, hope to play again soon! | |
| Autumn, 2013: I'm new here. Is there a way to mute a game I've been eliminated from? | |
| Autumn, 2013: Well played Florida, you held out for a long time despite the odds being stacked against you | |
| Autumn, 2013: I enjoyed this game. We should all play again with one another at some point. This was great fun. Hmmm not sure Peru. Ask a mod? | |
| Agreed. I've really enjoyed it and would very happily play with everyone again | |
| Well, maybe not Texas... | |
| Good game all! | |
| GG | |
| Gg I was very luck in fall into this game | |
| GG all. | |
| Let's do it again guys https://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=340256 |
|
| https://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=349104 Third instalment ;-) |
| Heartland |
Redesdale
(488
)
Drawn. Bet: 0
, won: 35 18 supply-centers, 18 units | ||
| British-Columbia |
Flying Capybara
(765
)
Drawn. Bet: 14
, won: 35 14 supply-centers, 14 units | ||
| California |
Browncow
(542
)
Drawn. Bet: 14
, won: 35 14 supply-centers, 14 units | ||
| Mexico |
Uhtred II
(240
)
Drawn. Bet: 14
, won: 35 12 supply-centers, 12 units | ||
| Quebec |
Anneal
(245
)
Defeated. Bet: 14
| ||
| Florida |
Doshy II
(240
)
Defeated. Bet: 14
| ||
| Peru |
Arca
(103
)
Defeated. Bet: 0
| ||
| New-York |
Hoxhahalic
(100
)
Defeated. Bet: 14
| ||
| Texas |
Heronickk
(100
)
Defeated. Bet: 14
| ||
| Cuba |
freeman69
(24
)
Defeated. Bet: 14
|
| GroverCleveland2.0 (2275 ) | Heartland (Spring, 2010) with 15 centres. |
| Ozcar (378 ) | Heartland (Autumn, 2010) with 15 centres. |
| susking (104 ) | Peru (Spring, 2007) with 1 centres. |