13 Jan 17 UTC | Spring, 1999: Good luck all! Hopefully this game doesn't suffer from the CD sickness. |
15 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 1999: I second that |
18 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2000: Welcome new Cuba, thanks for subbing. |
19 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2000: Welcome new Cuba, thanks for subbing. |
19 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2000: Yep. Thanks Cuba. |
19 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2000: And New Cuba doesn't move either |
19 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2000: lol |
22 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2001: My initial strategy does not seem to be working too well... ;) |
22 Jan 17 UTC | Autumn, 2001: well... in 2000 you moved idaho south for some reason -- you're aware that you can break support even if the space you're occupying is contested right? |
04 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2005: Any year now NY |
04 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2005: For that, I think I will just let the time run |
04 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2005: Um okay |
07 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: Oh Quebec. Had to go ruin a good thing and try to solo. |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: WARNING: Having stabbed exactly EVERYBODY Quebec has aligned himself with, he's now on the warpath to solo. The only way to stop him is for the rest of the remaining nations to stop fighting, agree to a 4W draw and coordinate north against him until he slithers back into his nest. I repeat: this is the only way to stop him. He has 20 units after next turn. Peru, he's using you. He insisted Mexico (and myself since we've obv been aligned) attack you. Now you're the key to securing his solo. If you think he's not going to stab you as well, he's lying. He has lied to everyone who has worked with him. If you ignore this warning, it's gg Quebec. |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: I would like to say that this is not true. I have never lied to Peru nor do I plan to. He asked me to attack Mexico and Texas last turn and so I did that. He can confirm that. HE also asked me to help him with Florida which I did as a good ally. I never fully trusted you or Mexico, Texas. So of course I told you all things that I did not plan to do, that is called Diplomacy. I will not turn on Peru no matter what. Peru, if you do turn against me, I understand, they have built a convincing case, but like the case against Lincoln Burrows, it is not true. I am with you to the end Peru. I never told them to attack you. But I did not say anything that would provoke attack against myself. If you see that as betrayal, I apologize. I just felt this needed to be said publicly, Peru, but I have never nor have I wanted to betray you |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: Listen to the desperation. He knows you're the key to securing his victory Peru. He selfishly sent mexico to attack you so he could take advantage of us being busy with you while he came in from the north. Trust him at your own peril Peru. He's lied to everyone else. Together we can stop him. |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: He INSISTED we cut you out of the endgame alliance Peru. Insisted. Which is why we're on your doorstep. Lies are all the guy knows I guess. |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: you all are so full of it. Peru, you know we have a solid alliance; but again if they sway you, I cannot fault you for your decision. It is a game of diplomacy after all, and if they sway you they bested me in diplomacy to which I will say "gg." But I am not lying to you. I also can see you have not been on in a while. So good luck reading through all of these messages :) |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: Jokes on you all I'm going to solo |
08 Feb 17 UTC | Spring, 2006: ^^ master manipulator, im done with public comments. peru, what i said is true. he sent us. believe it or not but i have no reason to make it up and he's lying to you now, too. |